Re: [PATCH] private mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



on den 27.04.2005 Klokka 16:58 (+0200) skreiv Pavel Machek:

> > 
> > And b) is _the_ most important feature IMO, so the argument for
> > stripping it out has to be very good.
> 
> Well, you'll have problems with suid programs suddenly not being able
> to access files. nfs gets away with it, but nfs is perceived as
> "broken" anyway...

Really?

The NFS security model is based on the principle that the administrator
of the SERVER can override access permissions on his/her hardware. Pray
tell why you think that is "broken"?

Cheers,
  Trond

-- 
Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux