A few more style comments below. Nice cleanup compared to the first
version though. Now let's get it perfect :-)
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Sune Mølgaard wrote:
> Domen Puncer wrote:
> > On 26/04/05 21:00 +0200, Sune Mølgaard wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by? And weird indentification, try to use tabs.
> >
>
> Signed-off-by Sune Molgaard [email protected]
Proper form would be: Signed-off-by: Sune Molgaard <[email protected]>
> +static int pirq_pico_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int
> pirq, int irq)
> +{
> + outb(0x10+((pirq-1)>>1), 0x24);
^^^^^^^^
Proper indentation depth (8 chars)
> + unsigned int x;
^^^^^^^
Only 7 char indentation.
This mismatch is found several places in the patch. Besides, the patch
seems whitespace damaged - the lines seem to be indented with spaces, not
tabs. Perhaps your email client mangled it?
(note: Chapter 1 of Documentation/CodingStyle describes proper
indentation)
> + switch(device)
> + {
The opening brace goes on the same line as the switch statement.
See Documentation/CodingStyle Chapter 2
--
Jesper Juhl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]