On 4/27/05, Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/27/05, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> >
>
> While the patch is correct I'd have something like this as well:
>
> --- linux-2.6.11.orig/fs/sysfs/file.c
> +++ linux-2.6.11/fs/sysfs/file.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ subsys_attr_store(struct kobject * kobj,
> {
> struct subsystem * s = to_subsys(kobj);
> struct subsys_attribute * sattr = to_sattr(attr);
> - ssize_t ret = 0;
> + ssize_t ret = -ENOSYS;
>
> if (sattr->store)
> ret = sattr->store(s,page,count);
>
> So writes without store handler would return "not implemented".
>
Obviously driver_sysfs_ops, bus_sysfs_ops, etc need the same treatment...
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
