Hi David,
On 26 Apr 2005 21:54:35 +0200, David N. Welton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh, I most certainly will polish the code as much as possible should
> it prove of interest, but I think what needs vetting is the idea
> itself, which I described clearly in english in a subsequent email.
> If the idea itself stinks, I'm happy to drop it before spending time
> playing around with indentation and other niceties.
But see, that's the problem. You think _other people_ should spend
time reviewing your work first so _you_ don't have to waste time.
Unfortunately, it looks to me like no one is willing to spend their
time reviewing a patch which (a) does not follow
Documentation/CodingStyle and (b) is not submitted as per
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
I mean, how much work is it to run you code through scripts/Lindent
and drop those awful function banner comments and resend the patch?-)
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
