Re: [patch] __block_write_full_page bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:

Those tests for buffer_async_write(bh) are redundant now, aren't they?


Like this?

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Previous patch made buffer_async_write tests superfluous.
As suggested by Andrew Morton.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c	2005-04-25 13:14:52.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c	2005-04-27 11:00:01.000000000 +1000
@@ -1843,8 +1843,8 @@ static int __block_write_full_page(struc
 
 	for (nr_underway = 0; nr_underway < idx; nr_underway++) {
 		bh = arr[nr_underway];
-		if (buffer_async_write(bh))
-			submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
+		BUG_ON(!buffer_async_write(bh));
+		submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
 		put_bh(bh);
 	}
 
@@ -1904,10 +1904,9 @@ recover:
 	unlock_page(page);
 	for (nr_underway = 0; nr_underway < idx; nr_underway++) {
 		bh = arr[nr_underway];
-		if (buffer_async_write(bh)) {
-			clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
-			submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
-		}
+		BUG_ON(!buffer_async_write(bh));
+		clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
+		submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
 		put_bh(bh);
 	}
 	goto done;

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux