On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:17:07PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> It looks good, except that the name of the macro is too long.
> I will queue it and fix the name up when I apply.
fine. let me know the new name, I'll regenerate a new set of patch for
x86 too. It's probably better to have the same name between the 2 archs.
> If you plan to add a lot more of these I would recommend
> to create a new header first, processor.h is already quite crowded.
Right. Although I think that's all (at least at the moment).
I'll consider that anyway, if more shows up.
Thanks,
--
Vincent Hanquez
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
