Re: [PATCH] private mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/26/05, Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > that complicates things a great deal, however -- if you split the
> > concept of "srv points" from file system mounts and remount the file
> > system (perhaps automatically as part of initiating the session) for
> > every new login -- then you can revalidate security at each of these
> > mounts.
> 
> Why would you have to revalidate?  A simple bind mount would suffice.
> However, joining another sessions namespace makes more sense, than
> copying the mounts individually.
> 

Well, the forced revalidation was an attempt to protect "user-data"
from root, which, as you pointed out in your reply, is a somewhat
sketchy thing.  It may also be useful if you wish to share a
filesystem/namespace with a subset of users with a permissions model
outside of the normal user/groups model (which the user doesn't really
have any control over).

Anyways, just an additional idea for consideration -- as I said, I
don't really feel a strong need for this, so perhaps its best
forgotten for now.

          -eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux