Re: [PATCH] Changing RT priority in kernel 2.6 without CAP_SYS_NICE

* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  Presently, a process without the capability CAP_SYS_NICE can not change 
> >  its own policy, which is OK.
> > 
> >  But it can also not decrease its RT priority (if scheduled with policy 
> >  SCHED_RR or SCHED_FIFO), which is what this patch changes.
> 
> This patch needed some massaging to copt with the changes in 
> nice-and-rt-prio-rlimits.patch - please check.
> 
> I guess we should merge nice-and-rt-prio-rlimits.patch.

the massaging looks ok - and i agree that we should merge the rt-rlimits 
patch.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Changing RT priority in kernel 2.6 without CAP_SYS_NICE
    • From: Olivier Croquette <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Changing RT priority in kernel 2.6 without CAP_SYS_NICE
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Changing RT priority in kernel 2.6 without CAP_SYS_NICE
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] hfsplus: don't leak sb->s_fs_info and don't oops on bad filesystem
• Next by Date: Re: ide-cd? Can burn DVDs, just not read them...
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Changing RT priority in kernel 2.6 without CAP_SYS_NICE
• Next by thread: Why Ext2/3 needs immutable attribute?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]