On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:39:20PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Yes.
> >
> > I believe it should just do suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND) before system
> > shutdown. If you think distintion between shutdown and suspend is
> > important (I am not 100% convinced it is), we can just add flag
> > saying "this is system shutdown".
> >
> > Actually this patch should be in the queue somewhere... We had it in
> > suse trees for a long time, and IMO it can solve problem easily.
>
> I think we probably want a distinct state for shutdown ...
>
> Ben.
Yes, it's possible we do. I'm not sure what every platform requires. The
question is should we make this change to pm_message_t in the short term?
"->shutdown", even though incorrect, seems to fill this role.
Greg, have you seen shutdown methods doing anything special other than
standard "->suspend" stuff?
Thanks,
Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
