Re: [PATCH] i386: fix hpet for systems that don't support legacy replacement (v. A0)

[Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>]

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, john stultz wrote:

> Andrew,
> 	Currently the i386 HPET code assumes the entire HPET implementation
> from the spec is present. This breaks on boxes that do not implement the
> optional legacy timer replacement functionality portion of the spec.
> 
> This patch, which is very similar to my x86-64 patch for the same issue,
> fixes the problem allowing i386 systems that cannot use the HPET for the
> timer interrupt and RTC to still use the HPET as a time source. I've
> tested this patch on a system systems without HPET, with HPET but
> without legacy timer replacement, as well as HPET with legacy timer
> replacement.
> 
> There has been no changes since this patch was sent out to lkml for
> review.
> 

Tiny, tiny nit : 

> -		if (is_hpet_enabled()){
> +		if (is_hpet_enabled() && hpet_use_timer){
                                                       ^^-- space here?


-- 
Jesper Juhl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/