On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Alexander Nyberg wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by "make kexec work nicer" but if it is because
> some devices don't work after a kexec I have some objections.
That was indeed the reason, at least in my case. The newly-rebooted
kernel doesn't work too well when there are active devices, with no driver
loaded, doing DMA and issuing IRQs because they were never shut down.
> What about the kexec-on-panic?
>
> In the end at least every storage device should work after a
> kexec-on-panic or else there might be cases where we cannot get dumps of
> what happened. My guess is that having access to the network might come
> in handy after a kexec-on-panic as well.
>
> So if this patch is because some devices don't work across kexec I don't
> think this is a good idea because the same devices won't work after a
> kexec-on-panic.
Do I understand your argument correctly? You seem to be saying that
because this new facility sometimes won't work (the kexec-on-panic case)
it shouldn't be added at all. What about all the other times when it will
work?
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
