Re: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:43:19 +0300
Avi Kivity <[email protected]> wrote:

> yes, if he frees the pages immediately after tcp_sendpage, then the 
> reference count would remain elevated until tcp completes sending these 
> pages. 

That's what I meant, sorry for the confusion.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • Re: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add pci shutdown ability
• Previous by thread: Re: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
• Next by thread: Re: tcp_sendpage and page allocation lifetime vs. iscsi
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]