On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 11:09 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > One more thing... > > On 4/21/05, Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 02:07 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > w1-master-drop-attrs.patch > > > Get rid of unneeded master device attributes: > > > - 'pointer' and 'attempts' are meaningless for userspace; > > > - information provided by 'slaves' and 'slave_count' can be gathered > > > from other sysfs bits; > > > - w1_slave_found has to be rearranged now that slave_count field is gone. > > > > attempts is usefull for broken lines. > > It simply increments with every search i.e. every 10 secondsby default > and does not provide indication of the quality of the wire. When slaves can not be found until several attempts, it means line is broken, how many time existing slave appeared/dissapeared during /sys/bus/w1/devices/w1_master1/attempts says about link quality. -- Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- References:
- [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- Prev by Date: Re: Re-routing packets via netfilter (ip_rt_bug)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/22] W1: sysfs, lifetime and other fixes
- Index(es):
 |