On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Comments are appreciated. If there are no vetoes agains the patch, I
> think it's suitable for -mm.
Vetoed. Having suid application with different pathname resolution than
that of parent just because it is suid is not acceptable. I'm sorry,
but breaking hell knows how many existing applications is not an option.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
