Re: [PATCH] prevent possible infinite loop in fs/select.c::do_pollfd()

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> wrote:
>
> If a sufficiently large 'num' is passed to the function, the for loop 
>  becomes an infinite loop - as far as I can see, that's a bug waiting to 
>  happen. Sure, 'len' in struct poll_list is currently an int, so currently 
>  this can't happen, but that might change in the future. In my oppinion, 
>  a function should be able to function correctly with the complete range 
>  of values that can potentially be passed via its parameters, and without 
>  the patch below that's just not true for this function.
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
> 
>  --- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-orig/fs/select.c	2005-04-05 21:21:47.000000000 +0200
>  +++ linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/fs/select.c	2005-04-24 01:11:13.000000000 +0200
>  @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ struct poll_list {
>   static void do_pollfd(unsigned int num, struct pollfd * fdpage,
>   	poll_table ** pwait, int *count)
>   {
>  -	int i;
>  +	unsigned int i;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>   		int fd;

An expression such as the above which mixes signed and unsigned types will
promote the signed types to unsigned.  So there is no bug in the above
`for' statement.

But there's a bug a bit further on:

> 		unsigned int mask;
> 		struct pollfd *fdp;
> 
> 		mask = 0;
> 		fdp = fdpage+i;

This will oops the kernel if there are more than 2^31 pollfd's at *fdpage.

Yes, like most signed variables in the kernel, `i' should really be
unsigned, but I don't think it's worth raising a patch to change it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/