Re: [patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 05:51 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> This is a good example why development against Linus' tree is ofter 
> pointless:

Seriously.

> A similar patch is already in -mm.

But...woohoo!

	Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation
    • From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Clean-up and bug fix for tdfxfb framebuffer size detection
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation
• Next by thread: [patch 2/2] kstrdup: replace a few
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]