RE: [discuss] [Patch] X86_64 TASK_SIZE cleanup

["Zou, Nanhai" <nanhai.zou@intel.com>]

Isn't that a 
!test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT)
in my patch?

Zou Nan hai

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@suse.de]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 7:51 PM
> To: Zou, Nanhai
> Cc: Andi Kleen; discuss@x86-64.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
Siddha,
> Suresh B
> Subject: Re: [discuss] [Patch] X86_64 TASK_SIZE cleanup
> 
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:17:40AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote:
> > Hi Andi,
> >    What is your comment on this patch?
> 
> There is at least one wrong change in there, you have a check
> for test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT)
> 
> and that is wrong because MAP_32BIT is used from 64bit code
> 
> -Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/