Isn't that a
!test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT)
in my patch?
Zou Nan hai
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 7:51 PM
> To: Zou, Nanhai
> Cc: Andi Kleen; [email protected]; [email protected];
Siddha,
> Suresh B
> Subject: Re: [discuss] [Patch] X86_64 TASK_SIZE cleanup
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:17:40AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote:
> > Hi Andi,
> > What is your comment on this patch?
>
> There is at least one wrong change in there, you have a check
> for test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT)
>
> and that is wrong because MAP_32BIT is used from 64bit code
>
> -Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
