Re: strange incremental patch size [2.6.12-rc2 to 2.6.12-rc3]

[Joost Remijn <remijnj@d20.nl>]

Maciej Soltysiak wrote:

>Hi,
>
>These are the sizes of rc2 and rc3 patches
>
># ls -la patch-2.6.12*
>-rw-r--r--  1 root src 18011382 Apr  4 18:50 patch-2.6.12-rc2
>-rw-r--r--  1 root src 19979854 Apr 21 02:29 patch-2.6.12-rc3
>
>Let us make an incremental patch from rc2 to rc3
>
># interdiff patch-2.6.12-rc2 patch-2.6.12-rc3 >x
>
>Let us see how big it is.
># ls -ld x
>-rw-r--r--  1 root src 37421924 Apr 21 12:28 x
>
>How come interdiff from rc2 (18MB) to rc3 (20MB) gave me
>37MB worth of patch-code ? I would expect something about
>2MB but 40MB ?
>
>  
>
The order in the patch changed a lot. The rc2 patch starts with the
changes in the CREDITS file and the rc3 patch has those starting at line
151839.  This is probably because Linus now uses different tools to
produce these. Maybe you can somehow sort the rc2 patch in the same way
as the rc3 patch (same file order) before using interdiff, that should
solve it.

Joost

>The patching with the incremental patch took very long compared
>to other rc2-rc3-type patches, that is how I noticed it.
>
>Regards,
>Maciej
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>  
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature