Ralf Baechle wrote:
I'd try a shared library based approach for on the fly updates.
The version that I've seen imposed requirements on the application for this to work properly.
There are tradeoffs either way. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- Next by Date: NForce4 ide problems?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- Index(es):
 |