Hi, On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Like "ipw2x00 looses packets" if this happens too often? See "PCI latency error if C3 enabled" on http://ipw2100.sf.net -- it causes network instability, frequent firmware restarts. Dominik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1
- From: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1
- From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
- Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1
- Prev by Date: working around gcc bogons (was: Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] nameing reserved pages [0/3]
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1 - C-state measures
- Index(es):
 |