Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 01/05] scsi: make blk layer set REQ_SOFTBARRIER when a request is dispatched

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:40 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>  Hello, Jens.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:30:10AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Do it on requeue, please - not on the initial spotting of the request.
> 
>  This is the reworked version of the patch.  It sets REQ_SOFTBARRIER
> in two places - in elv_next_request() on BLKPREP_DEFER and in
> blk_requeue_request().
> 
>  Other patches apply cleanly with this patch or the original one and
> the end result is the same, so take your pick.  :-)
> 

I'm not sure that you need *either* one.

As far as I'm aware, REQ_SOFTBARRIER is used when feeding requests
into the top of the block layer, and is used to guarantee the device
driver gets the requests in a specific ordering.

When dealing with the requests at the other end (ie.
elevator_next_req_fn, blk_requeue_request), then ordering does not
change.

That is - if you call elevator_next_req_fn and don't dequeue the
request, then that's the same request you'll get next time.

And blk_requeue_request will push the request back onto the end of
the queue in a LIFO manner.

So I think adding barriers, apart from not doing anything, confuses
the issue because it suggests there *could* be reordering without
them.

Or am I completely wrong? It's been a while since I last got into
the code.


-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/