Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense

ty den 19.04.2005 Klokka 21:45 (+0200) skreiv Jakob Oestergaard:

> It mounts a home directory from a 2.6.6 NFS server - the client and
> server are on a hub'ed 100Mbit network.
> 
> On the earlier 2.6 client I/O performance was as one would expect on
> hub'ed 100Mbit - meaning, not exactly stellar, but you'd get around 4-5
> MB/sec and decent interactivity.

OK, hold it right there...

So, IIRC the problem was that you were seeing abominable retrans rates
on UDP and TCP, and you are using a 100Mbit hub rather than a switch?

What does the collision LED look like, when you see these performance
problems?
Also, does that hub support NICs that do autonegotiation? (I'll bet the
answer is "no").

Cheers,
  Trond

-- 
Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Greg Banks <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
  - From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2
Next by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2
Previous by thread: Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
Next by thread: Re: bdflush/rpciod high CPU utilization, profile does not make sense
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]