Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets

> > So you do _not_ want to consider nested sched domains, just disjoint
> > ones.  Good.
> > 
> 
> You don't either? Good. :)

>From the point of view of cpusets, I'd rather not think
about nested sched domains, for now at least.

But my scheduler savvy colleagues on the big SGI boxes
may well have ambitions here.  I can't speak for them.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
    • From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]