Takashi Ikebe wrote: >Sorry, I may mistake the point, >Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > >>that would also be a problem for live patching too, if you have bad >>state, you have bad state --- live patching doesn't change that >> >> >What I want to say is takeover may makes memory unstable, because there >are extra operations to reserve current (unstable) status to memory. >Live patching never force target process to reserve status to memory. Is >this make sense? > > Sorry, I misunderstand it, forget above comment, both methods are possible to destroy memory. -- Takashi Ikebe NTT Network Service Systems Laboratories 9-11, Midori-Cho 3-Chome Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan Tel : +81 422 59 4246, Fax : +81 422 60 4012 e-mail : [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
- Index(es):
 |