Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7

Takashi Ikebe wrote:

>Sorry, I may mistake the point,
>Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>  
>
>>that would also be a problem for live patching too, if you have bad
>>state, you have bad state --- live patching doesn't change that
>>    
>>
>What I want to say is takeover may makes memory unstable, because there
>are extra operations to reserve current (unstable) status to memory.
>Live patching never force target process to reserve status to memory. Is
>this make sense?
>  
>
Sorry, I misunderstand it, forget above comment, both methods are
possible to destroy memory.


-- 
Takashi Ikebe
NTT Network Service Systems Laboratories
9-11, Midori-Cho 3-Chome Musashino-Shi,
Tokyo 180-8585 Japan
Tel : +81 422 59 4246, Fax : +81 422 60 4012
e-mail : [email protected]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
    • From: Takashi Ikebe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Live Patching Function on 2.6.11.7
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]