Re: intercepting syscalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Intercepting system call table is an elegant way to solve many
> problems.

I think I want to take offence to this. It's the worst possible way to
solve many problems, especially since almost everyone who did this to
get anything done until today got it wrong.

It's about locking. Portability. Stability

but also about doing things at the right layer. The syscall layer is
almost NEVER the right layer.

Can you explain exactly what you are trying to do (it's not a secret I
assume, kernel modules are GPL and open source after all, esp such
invasive ones) and I'll try to tell you why it's wrong to do it at the
syscall intercept layer... deal ?

Greetings,
    Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux