Re: [PATCH] crypto: resource release functions ought to check for NULL (crypto_free_tfm)

On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
> As far as I'm aware there's a general concensus that functions that are 
> responsible for freeing resources should be able to cope with being passed 
> a NULL pointer. This makes sense as it removes the need for all callers to 

In general I'd only do this when most of the callers are doing the
NULL check.  As that seems to be the case here, I agree with your
change.  I've applied it to my tree.

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] crypto: resource release functions ought to check for NULL (crypto_free_tfm)
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] crypto: resource release functions ought to check for NULL (crypto_free_tfm)
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATC] small VFS change for JFFS2
• Next by Date: Re: [PATC] small VFS change for JFFS2
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] crypto: resource release functions ought to check for NULL (crypto_free_tfm)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] crypto: resource release functions ought to check for NULL (crypto_free_tfm)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]