On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:05:55AM -0000, [email protected] wrote:
> MErging e-mails, first from [email protected]:
> > You really ought to look at the _current_ implementation. There is no
> > SHA1 code in random.c.
>
> So I'm imagining the call to sha_transform() in 2.6.12-rc2's
> extract_buf()? The SHA1 code has been moved to lib/sha1.c, so there's
> no SHA1 code *lexically* in random.c, but that's a facile response;
> it's a cryptologically meaningless change.
No, it's exactly to the point: he's forked random.c before a large set
of changes that he needs to be aware of. The SHA1 code is now shared
by cryptolib and obviously no longer suffers from the (non-existent)
weakness he referenced.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
