Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality

Hi!

> > Arguably, using dm-crypt is more secure, but it is also more
> > complicated from the Joe User POV. IMHO we should not force users to
> > set up dm-crypt, remember passwords etc., to get some basic
> > security.
> 
> Any sensible solution here is going to require remembering passwords.

Andreas has sensible good enough for preventing leaks from mlocked
data, and surprise, it does not need remembering anything.
								Pavel

-- 
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
    • From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
    • From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Exploit in 2.6 kernels
• Next by Date: Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]