On 14.04.2005, at 19:25, Ross Biro wrote:
Just to be clear, we can have two users A and B with the exact same hardware. A setting of =y will screw user A and a setting of =n will screw user B. Ideally, they would both get better hardware, but that is not always an option.
You tell me a better[1] 32bit GigE PCI adapter than Intel E1000 and I sure do this. It's pretty interesting to see that those who buy some not-so-cheeep hardware are being screwed in this case; it should be in Intels best interest to help fix this issue ASAP and permantently for all users. [1] better performance at less CPU utilization + good diagnostics and negotiation capabilities Servus, Daniel
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- From: Ross Biro <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- From: Ross Biro <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- From: Ross Biro <[email protected]>
- [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- Prev by Date: Re: DVD writer and IDE support...
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cifs: md5 cleanup - functions
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/Patch 2.6.11] Take control of PCI Master Abort Mode
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.11.6 1/6] irq and pci_ids: patch for Intel ESB2
- Index(es):