On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:47:40PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:12:18AM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > Well, that's certainly an interesting question. The filesystem is IBM's > > JFS. If you tell me that's part of the problem, I'm not likely to > > disagree. 8^) > > It would be nice if you could reproduce with ext3 or reiserfs (if with > ext3, after applying the memleak fix from Andrew that was found in this > same thread ;). The below make it look like a jfs problem. > > 830696 830639 99% 0.80K 207674 4 830696K jfs_ip I'll see what I can do. It may be difficult to move all the data to a different filesystem. There are multiple terabytes in use. I'll refer the JFS developers to this thread, too, they may be able to shed some light on it. Thanks. noah -- Noah Meyerhans System Administrator MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Re: OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4
- Prev by Date: Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
- Next by Date: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6
- Previous by thread: Re: OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2-mm3] serial: update NEC VR4100 series serial support
- Index(es):
 |