Re: [patch] sched: fix active load balance

* Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]> wrote:

> Your suggestion also looks similar to my patch. You are also breaking 
> on the first one.

yeah.

> We want the first domain spanning both the cpu's. That is the domain 
> where normal load balance failed and we restore to active load 
> balance.

indeed.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] sched: fix active load balance
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] sched: fix active load balance
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] sched: fix active load balance
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
• Next by Date: Kernel messages
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] sched: fix active load balance
• Next by thread: Re: pty_chars_in_buffer NULL pointer (kernel oops)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]