Re: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK

On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 09:42 +0900, tsuchiya yoshihiro wrote:
> Hi,
> In Fedora Core3, interruptible_sleep_on() checks if the system is
> lock_kernel()'ed
> by SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK. Same thing is done in RedHatEL4.
> Also I found a patch including SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK was posted before,
> but is not included in 2.6.11.
> Why SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK checks lock_kernel ?

Because you really need to hold the BKL when you call sleep_on() family
of APIs, otherwise you have a very big race.

Also note that you in your code really should not call any of the
sleep_on() family of functions at all! It is a very very deprecated and
defective API!!!!

Can you give the URL to the code where you use this in?
(it is GPL code, right?)

Greetings,
    Arjan van de Ven

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
    • From: tsuchiya yoshihiro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
    • From: tsuchiya yoshihiro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: initrd support in 2.6 kernels
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
• Previous by thread: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
• Next by thread: Re: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]