Re: Re: more git updates..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Russell King wrote:
> 
> And my entire 2.6.12-rc2 BK tree, unchecked out, is about 220MB, which
> is more dense than CVS.
> 
> BK is also a lot better than CVS.  So _your_ point is?

Hey, anybody who wants to argue that BK is getter than GIT won't be 
getting any counter-arguments from me.

The fact is, I have constraints. Like needing something to work within a
few days. If somebody comes up with a ultra-fast, replicatable, space
efficient SCM in three days, I'm all over it. 

In the meantime, I'd suggest people who worry about network bandwidth try 
to work out a synchronization protocol that allows you to send "diff 
updates" between git repositories. The git model doesn't preclude looking 
at the objects and sending diffs instead (and re-creating the objects on 
the other side). But my time-constraints _do_.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux