Why not GNU Arch instead of BitKeeper?

Hi,

I'm surprised nobody considered GNU Arch(http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/) to replace BitKeeper - it wasprobably started in direct response to the Linux Kernel using anon-free tool.

I must say I haven't used it, but from reviews and comparisons I'veread, it seems to be a good tool.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not GNU Arch instead of BitKeeper?
  - From: Miles Bader <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Next by Date: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Previous by thread: [patch 013/198] SELinux: fix bug in Netlink message type detection
Next by thread: Re: Why not GNU Arch instead of BitKeeper?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]