Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex

On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 04:09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Unless i'm missing something, this could be implemented by detaching
> lock->owner_prio from lock->owner - via e.g. negative values. Thus some
> minimal code would check whether we need the owner's priority in the PI
> logic, or the semaphore's "own" priority level.

The owners priority should be set to the semaphore's priority .. Or the
highest priority of all the semaphores that it has locked.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex
  - From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [patch 174/198] IB/mthca: fix format of CQ number for CQ events
Next by Date: [patch 198/198] md: remove a number of misleading calls to MD_BUG
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]