On Tuesday 12 April 2005 01:46, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Claudio Martins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think I'm going to give a try to Neil's patch, but I'll have to apply
> > some patches from -mm.
>
> Just this one if you're using 2.6.12-rc2:
>
> --- 25/drivers/md/md.c~avoid-deadlock-in-sync_page_io-by-using-gfp_noio Mon
> Apr 11 16:55:07 2005 +++ 25-akpm/drivers/md/md.c Mon Apr 11 16:55:07 2005
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static int bi_complete(struct bio *bio,
> static int sync_page_io(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, int
> size, struct page *page, int rw)
> {
> - struct bio *bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 1);
> + struct bio *bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, 1);
> struct completion event;
> int ret;
>
> _
Hi Andrew, all,
Sorry for the delay in reporting. This patch does indeed fix the problem.
The machine ran stress for almost 15h straight with no problems at all.
As for Nick's patch I, too, think it would be nice to be included (once the
performance problems are sorted out), since it seemed to make the block layer
more robust and well behaved (at least with stress), although I didn't run
performance tests to measure regressions.
Thanks Nick, Neil, Andrew and all others for your great help with this
issue. I'll have to put the machine on production now with the patch applied,
but let me know if I can be of any further help with these issues.
Thanks
Claudio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]