Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> writes:
> The full .git archive for 199 versions of the kernel (the 2.6.12-rc2 one
> and a test-run of 198 patches from Andrew) is 111MB. In other words,
> adding 198 "full" new kernels only grew the archive by 9MB (that's all
> "actual disk usage" btw - the files themselves are smaller, but since they
> all end up taking up a full disk block..)
Does that mean that the 64 K changes imported from bk would take ~ 3 GB?
Is that real?
Have to tried to import it?
I'm going to import the CVS data (with cvsps) - as the CVS "misses" half
the changes, the resulting archive should be half in size too?
I don't know how much space did bk use, but 3 GB for the full history
is reasonable for most people, isn't it? Especially that one can purge
older data.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
