> There was a thread a few months ago where file-as-directory was > discussed extensively, after Namesys implemented it. That's where the > conversation on detachable mount points originated AFAIR. It will > probably happen at some point. > > A nice implemention of it in FUSE could push it along a bit :) Aren't there some assumptions in VFS that currently make this impossible? I'll go and find that thread. Thanks, Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Jan Hudec <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- References:
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: "Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- Prev by Date: Re: Bugreport
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: very basic desktop g5 sound support (#2)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- Index(es):
 |