Re: [stable] [patch 1/1] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular

* [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> 
> CC: <[email protected]>
> 
> This trick is useless, because sys_ni.c will handle this problem by itself,
> like it does even on UML for other syscalls.
> Also, it does not provide the NFSD syscall when NFSD is compiled as a module,
> which is a big problem.

Thanks, queued to -stable.
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 1/1] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: No more 30 days delays for Software
• Next by Date: [PATCH] usb: kfree cleanup for drivers/usb/* - no need to check for NULL
• Previous by thread: [patch 1/1] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
• Next by thread: [patch 026/198] ppc32: ppc4xx_pic - add acknowledge when enabling level-sensitive IRQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]