Re: Call to atention about using hash functions as content indexers (SCM saga)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Magnus Damm <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/12/05, Petr Baudis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> (iv) You fail to propose a better solution.
>
> I would feel safer with back end storage filenames based on email and
> mtime together with an optional hash lookup that turns collisions into
> worse performance. But that's just me.

Have a look at bazaar-ng (http://www.bazaar-ng.org/), they seem to do
this. I had a quick look at it and they also seem to store the full
files when they change (similar to git). It is also a bit ahead of git
(started earlier) and looks quite promising.

-- 
Catalin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux