[patch] x86, x86_64: dual core proc-cpuinfo and sibling-map fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Appended patch fixes

- broken sibling_map setup in x86_64

- grouping all the core and HT related cpuinfo fields.
  We are reasonably sure that adding new cpuinfo fields after "siblings" field,
  will not cause any app failure. Thats because today's /proc/cpuinfo
  format is completely different on x86, x86_64 and we haven't heard of any
  x86 app breakage because of this issue. Grouping these fields will 
  result in more or less common format on all architectures (ia64, x86 and 
  x86_64) and will cause less confusion.

Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]>

diff -Nru linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c linux-mc/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c
--- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c	2005-04-11 17:12:16.939435632 -0700
+++ linux-mc/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c	2005-04-11 17:13:31.757061624 -0700
@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@
 		seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
 		seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
 				c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
+		seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", cpu_core_id[n]);
+		seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores);
 	}
 #endif
 	
@@ -130,13 +132,6 @@
 		     c->loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
 		     (c->loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	/* Put new fields at the end to lower the probability of
-	   breaking user space parsers. */
-	seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", cpu_core_id[n]);
-	seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores);
-#endif
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff -Nru linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c linux-mc/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
--- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c	2005-04-11 17:12:17.074415112 -0700
+++ linux-mc/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c	2005-04-11 17:14:34.250561168 -0700
@@ -1179,6 +1179,8 @@
 		seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[cpu]);
 		seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
 				c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
+		seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", cpu_core_id[cpu]);
+		seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores);
 	}
 #endif	
 
@@ -1222,15 +1224,8 @@
 			}
 	}
 
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+	seq_printf(m, "\n\n");
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	/* Put new fields at the end to lower the probability of
-	   breaking user space parsers. */
-	seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", cpu_core_id[c - cpu_data]);
-	seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores);
-#endif
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff -Nru linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c linux-mc/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
--- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c	2005-04-11 17:12:17.076414808 -0700
+++ linux-mc/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c	2005-04-11 17:41:52.704478312 -0700
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@
 		int i;
 		if (smp_num_siblings > 1) {
 			for_each_online_cpu (i) {
-				if (cpu_core_id[cpu] == phys_proc_id[i]) {
+				if (cpu_core_id[cpu] == cpu_core_id[i]) {
 					siblings++;
 					cpu_set(i, cpu_sibling_map[cpu]);
 				}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux