Re: [rfc] git: combo-blobs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

> > to construct the combo blob later on, we do have to unpack sched.c (and 
> > if it's already a combo-blob that is not cached then we'd have to unpack 
> > all parents until we arrive at some full blob).
> 
> I really don't want to have this. Having chains of dependencies is 
> really painful, and now if _any_ of them gets corrupted, you're 
> screwed.

if a repository is corrupted then it pretty much needs to be dropped 
anyway. Also, with a 'replicate the full object on every 8th commit' 
rule the risk would be somewhat mitigated as well.

but yeah, i can very much see the point of trying to avoid that 
complexity. (Also, it's not like delta blobs couldnt be introduced later 
on, if there's enough (if any) pressure to reduce storage overhead.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux