* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > Would there be any harm with changing that to > > #define jbd_debug(f, a...) do {} while(0) > > The compiler would strip it anyway, and you wouldn't have to worry > about your scripts removing the macro. yeah, that's what i did in -45-01. Since it's not the first time this has happened i might have to change the marker to /*I*/ or something like that :-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- References:
- [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-25
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- From: "K.R. Foley" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel SCM saga..
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel SCM saga..
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00
- Index(es):
 |