Re: [PATCH] silence spinlock/rwlock uninitialized break_lock member warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?

Spose I can stick it in -mm.

> It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
> include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: missing initializer
> include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: (near initialization for `(anonymous).break_lock')
> include/asm/rwsem.h:88: warning: missing initializer
> include/asm/rwsem.h:88: warning: (near initialization for `(anonymous).break_lock')
> so there's less to sift through when looking for real problems with this 
> patch applied. 
> I've been using it for a while with no ill effects.

But I'd rather not add a bunch of even-more-ifdefs to support a compiler
flag which we're not going to use.  It's easy enough for the `gcc -W' user
to add the patch himself.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux