Re: Odd Timer behavior in 2.6 vs 2.4 (1 extra tick)

On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 10:39 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> I've created a pretty straight forward timer using setitimer, and noticed
> some odd differences between 2.4 and 2.6, I wonder if I could get a
> clarification if this is the way it should work, or if I should continue to
> try to "fix" it.

Hi, could you send me a simple program that shows the latency, then I'll
be able to analysis exactly where the problem (if there is a problem)
is.

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Odd Timer behavior in 2.6 vs 2.4 (1 extra tick)
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc1-mm4] fork_connector: add a fork connector
• Next by Date: Re: set keyboard repeat rate: EVIOCGREP and EVIOCSREP
• Previous by thread: Odd Timer behavior in 2.6 vs 2.4 (1 extra tick)
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Bad rounding in timeval_to_jiffies [was: Re: Odd Timer behavior in 2.6 vs 2.4 (1 extra tick)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]