Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 20:01 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > > Because we already know that patents on MP3 decoders are not > > enforceable. Furthermore, the holders of these patents have repeatedly > > How do you know the patents aren't enforceable? Because decoding a MP3 is a trivial operation. > > stated they won't ask for fees on MP3 decoders. > > http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/index.html > > talks about 0.75 Dollar for a decoder. I can't find the reference, but IIRC it was stated later that they don't want to apply this to free (as in beer) software. > > > Documentation is "software"? > > > > Sure. > > Every book in my book shelf is software? If you digitalize it, yes. > That doesn't match how people outside of Debian use the word "software". When we tried to define what is "software", the only acceptable definitions we found were things like "every kind of numeric stuff" or "everything that can be included in Debian". You can try to come up with your own, you'll see it's not that easy. > > GFDL documentation will still be available in the non-free archive. > > Assuming you have an online connection and a friend told you how to > manually edit your /etc/apt/sources.list for non-free. > > But where's the documentation if you don't have an online connection but > only the dozen binary CDs of Debian? Without the GFDL documentation, you'll have the right to lock the room in which you put the CDs. The GFDL forbids that, because you'd be "using technical measures to obstruct further copying" of the documentations. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [email protected] `. `' [email protected] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Giuseppe Bilotta <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- References:
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Michael Poole <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Sven Luther <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: [email protected] (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Josselin Mouette <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Josselin Mouette <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Josselin Mouette <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Prev by Date: RE: [patch] sched: unlocked context-switches
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel SCM saga..
- Previous by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Next by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Index(es):