Hi Linus.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
The NMI code had better be really careful, and yeah, I suspect it needs
fixing.
And since the NMI return will need a
ESP fixup too, it will require the
"branched" version of the restore_all
checks I suppose.
2. How can one be sure there are no more
of the like places where the stack is left
empty?
That's a good argument, and may be the strongest reason for _not_ doing
the speculation.
I haven't said that explicitly, only
implied:) My another idea was to adjust
the tss.esp0 to always point 8 bytes below
the real top of the stack, so that even in
case of an NMI we are still safe. And in
case of another such instance - too.
This may look more like a hack than shifting
the "sti", but it is probably more reliable.
At least something to consider as soon as we
are at it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]