On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:22:57PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> >| Anyway, besides nitpicking, is there any reason not to include this
> >| code? Or is the added feature considered plain bloat? Yes, the kernel
> >| will become a bit larger, but all the data added by this patch will go
> >| into the init section.
> >
> >Looks like a good idea to me.
> >
> Can't you disable module-loading with a module? I think so.
> You don't need to modify the kernel. Boot-scripts could
> just load the "final" module and there is nothing that
> can be done to add another module (or even unload existing
> ones).
Why do you need a module ?
echo 0xFFFEFFFF ?> /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bound
should do this just fine.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
