On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 12:17:37PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 20:10 +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > 2.6.12-rc2, with CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG. The
> > in_atomic() macro thinks that preempt_disable() indicates an atomic
> > region so calls to __might_sleep() result in a stack trace.
>
> but you're not allowed to schedule when preempt is disabled!
>
Could it be related to this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111277325629959&w=2
--
Romano Giannetti - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain)
Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2416 fax +34 915 596 569
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
