On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:51 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Linus,
>
> > That "individual patches" is one of the keywords, btw. One thing that BK
> > has been extremely good at, and that a lot of people have come to like
> > even when they didn't use BK, is how we've been maintaining a much finer-
> > granularity view of changes. That isn't going to go away.
>
> Are you happy with processing patches + descriptions, one per mail?
> Do you have it automated to the point where processing emailed patches
> involves little more overhead than doing a bk pull? If so, then your
> mailbox (or patch queue) becomes a natural serialization point for the
> changes, and the need for a tool that can handle a complex graph of
> changes is much reduced.
alternatively you could send an mbox with your series in... that has a
natural sequence in it ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
